9 essays tagged “European regulations”.
The first national European standard on AI professional profiles was published on 30 April. It is worth taking seriously, and it is worth mistrusting in the right way.
On why the software supply contract, as we have known it, has stopped being the central instrument of the relationship between vendor and client — and how much it costs to keep pretending it still is.
Treating regulatory compliance as the adversary of the technical project means you haven't understood what the technical project is. An essay on the category error weakening Europe's software industry — and on how the European framework, read as a system rather than as a list, configures a structural competitive advantage for those who learn to inhabit it.
The EDPB's DPIA template, released in April, isn't a longer form. It codifies a form. On the shift from module to genre, and what changes for anyone who writes compliance as continuous writing practice.
Why the «product» on which modern liability law is built no longer exists in contemporary software — and what we might put in its place.
When people shout that the state is "holding back progress," are they really talking about progress: or something else entirely?
Over the next 18 months CRA, AI Act, PLD, NIS2 and EAA will reshape European software. Compliance isn’t a checkbox: it’s designed into architecture.
Between 2026 and 2027, software becomes a product with legal liability. If the client only wants go-live, the risk stays with everyone.
Software runs the world yet stays invisible. Between ai, open source and European rules, trust is built with care, choices, and responsibility.
Type something to begin.