22 essays tagged “Artificial intelligence”.
Concept: Wikidata · Q11660
I am an atheist, I come from philosophy, I work in European compliance. Leo XIV's first encyclical on artificial intelligence is not something I signed, it is something I argued with. And I found in it a vocabulary that Brussels still lacks.
The first national European standard on AI professional profiles was published on 30 April. It is worth taking seriously, and it is worth mistrusting in the right way.
There's a diffuse tiredness we don't know how to name. It doesn't come from doing more: it comes from living inside a time that has lost its shape. AI doesn't speed the activity up — it replaces it with another, and the body, calibrated over years, can no longer read the day.
Agents do more work, but we work more too. The real bottleneck isn’t productivity: it’s the body—sleep, limits, and finite time.
OpenAI buys Astral, Anthropic bought Bun. The quiet colonization of the development stack has already begun, and it's not about open source.
AI is making time & materials unsustainable in IT consulting. What’s left to sell: outcomes, accountability, and trust. Not hours.
I built an app in 17 minutes without writing code. The point isn’t the demo, but what happens to consumer markets when software becomes intention.
Reading Mircha made me wonder what happens if the UI really dies. Maybe it’s not just the screen that disappears, but the application itself.
Between the AI Act, CRA and NIS2, Europe is rewriting the rules: it’s not who runs fastest that wins, but who builds serious, secure, accessible software.
In SMEs, AI isn’t a tech topic. It’s a cross-functional skill: knowing how to govern it, assess its output, and use it to do new things.
Saying "I don't know" looks like weakness, but it's often the most competent move. A story about consulting, AI, and the value of pausing before answering.
I asked a model to write a perfect proposal. I deleted it: it was missing the most important thing—the part written nowhere.
A three-minute demo replicated a year-long university project. A reflection on time, skills, and the risk that education becomes irrelevant.
Building a custom CMS is now faster than picking an off-the-shelf one: in 25 minutes with AI I turned my Astro blog into a dynamic, secure, intuitive system. Zero friction, full control.
There's a question that has been turning in my head for weeks—the kind that arrives at eleven at night when you're going back over everything that was produced during the day. The question is simple, almost banal: how do we govern what we can no longer read?
A few days ago a colleague on my team using Claude Code shipped a feature that, when I did his job, would have taken me half a day. He finished it in forty minutes.
A few nights ago I read an article. It's called The Death of Software 2.0 and uses a metaphor that stuck with me.
I spent the morning reviewing materials for an internal training course. Twenty-six dense pages, full of workflows, commands, checklists. At one point I stopped and looked out the window and asked: when did all of this happen?
There's a sentence from Adam Wathan that struck me, that I've been thinking about for two days since he posted it.
There's a thought that has been with me for months, maybe since AI stopped being a distant promise and became a tool we use every day.
I often find myself talking to HR leaders explaining their AI training needs. Courses on ChatGPT, prompt workshops, sessions on generative AI tools. And I always feel a little torn.
AI is becoming part of daily life almost without our noticing. The interesting part isn't that it's a technology question—it's that it's also, increasingly, a business question.
Type something to begin.